Sunday, September 02, 2007
Reply to Some Dude
Ok, so I found this angry guy on Zach Lind's blog, and I had to email him. So, here it is.
Well, I am having one of those nights. A night where I am restless with curiosity about what is going on in the theological world, evangelical world, just the world in general. Like always, I was skimming websites in search of words from new thinkers, curious bloggers and serious theologians. I came across your website and was offended. I must say, your website is well put together, the content however, poor. Poor, un-researched, narrow minded, ancient nonsense. I say this not to offend you, not to start a war of words and offenses. I say this to simply tell you that there is an, educated, growing group of believers who feel that hate speech like yours, and that of John Macarthur, is a silly waste of time. i am no Rob Bell fanatic, and I don't know Zach Lind from a hole in the ground. However, I am a reader, and Theology student, hence I spend a lot of time reading about the Christian world. Furthermore, after spending some ample time studying your work, along with reading many excerpts from Zach Lind's and Dan Kimbal's blogs (two men whom you believe to be emergent heretics, I have to say both Lind and Kimbal seem to have a MUCH greater understanding of the Kingdom of God than you. Not to mention they are both doing much more constructive things with their time. I have also heard many of Rob Bell's sermons, clearly you have not. You don't seem to have any idea what you are talking about when it comes to the emerging church. Lower your weapons and open your ears. Bell is doing beautiful things for the church and the kingdom. You seem to just sit around and write a lot of hateful blogs. Might I ask what good do you think you are doing? The Emergent movement is rolling like a freight train and it can not be stopped! The Emergent movement brings love and a real understanding of scripture. It says, "hay, let us get out there and put Jesus' teachings into actions, let us be the sermon on the mount and not just memorize it and call ourselves good Christians. Let us not waste our time by sitting around and writing 200 angry blogs about how much we hate Rob Bell".
That last one was a reference to you, in case you missed it. Give it up man, your uneducated rants are false, and they are doing...more harm than good.
Well, I am having one of those nights. A night where I am restless with curiosity about what is going on in the theological world, evangelical world, just the world in general. Like always, I was skimming websites in search of words from new thinkers, curious bloggers and serious theologians. I came across your website and was offended. I must say, your website is well put together, the content however, poor. Poor, un-researched, narrow minded, ancient nonsense. I say this not to offend you, not to start a war of words and offenses. I say this to simply tell you that there is an, educated, growing group of believers who feel that hate speech like yours, and that of John Macarthur, is a silly waste of time. i am no Rob Bell fanatic, and I don't know Zach Lind from a hole in the ground. However, I am a reader, and Theology student, hence I spend a lot of time reading about the Christian world. Furthermore, after spending some ample time studying your work, along with reading many excerpts from Zach Lind's and Dan Kimbal's blogs (two men whom you believe to be emergent heretics, I have to say both Lind and Kimbal seem to have a MUCH greater understanding of the Kingdom of God than you. Not to mention they are both doing much more constructive things with their time. I have also heard many of Rob Bell's sermons, clearly you have not. You don't seem to have any idea what you are talking about when it comes to the emerging church. Lower your weapons and open your ears. Bell is doing beautiful things for the church and the kingdom. You seem to just sit around and write a lot of hateful blogs. Might I ask what good do you think you are doing? The Emergent movement is rolling like a freight train and it can not be stopped! The Emergent movement brings love and a real understanding of scripture. It says, "hay, let us get out there and put Jesus' teachings into actions, let us be the sermon on the mount and not just memorize it and call ourselves good Christians. Let us not waste our time by sitting around and writing 200 angry blogs about how much we hate Rob Bell".
That last one was a reference to you, in case you missed it. Give it up man, your uneducated rants are false, and they are doing...more harm than good.
Saturday, March 17, 2007
What To Do, What To Do.
Over 2, 900 American soldiers killed in Iraq
Over 100,000 injuries in Iraq
About 55, 000 Iraqi civilians have died in the war
This may be as high as 200,000, but the Iraqi Government will not release the official numbers
1.2 Billion people live on .23 cents a day
1 billion people live on less than $2 dollars a day
The 3 wealthiest people alive today have more than all the worlds poorest countries combined
12% of the worlds population uses 85% of the worlds water
1 billion people in the world are without clean drinking water
Americans consume 26 billion liters of bottled water each year (bottled water)
Every 16 seconds someone dies of starvation.
2/3 of American are considered overweight
The U.S. is 4% of the worlds population
The U.S. G.D.P. is 21.4% of the worlds capital
Every year the U.S. spends more money on trash bags than half the world spends on combined goods.
80% of the world lives in what is called sub-standard conditions
2 billion people live without electricity
Last year 22 million people died of preventable diseases
10 million of those were children
Americans consume 20 million barrels of oil a day
the Next largest oil consumer is China...5.6 million barrels a day.
Currently the war in Iraq has cost U.S. taxpayers 349 billion dollars (you and I)
It has cost the Pentagon over 300 billion dollars
Government experts say that by the time the war ends it will have cost a total of 1 trillion dollars.......
JUST IN CASE YOU WERE WONDERING
It would cost 6 billion people to educate the whole planet(not trillion, billion)
9 billion to give basic water sanitation to the whole planet
12 billion for global reproductive health (go ahead and look at how many babies die or contract aids during birth in Africa alone.
13 billion for food and nutritional needs for all the world
.......Last year America spent 9 billion dollars for gifts on Black Friday (that day after Thanksgiving, where everybody rushes out to get the sales that start at 6 am)
What do you do with this?.......
I love the country I live in, I have not been opposed to the war, and I am not a Bush hater. I am not pro war or a Bush lover. Today, I am just another confused American trying to figure out what to do with all this. I am not trying to make you loathe our great country or the war, I guess this is just some stuff I can't get off my mind. Stuff we should all be thinking about. These are all accurate facts in Government reports. You can find them all in a Library or legitamate website.
God Bless America, and everyone else too.
Over 100,000 injuries in Iraq
About 55, 000 Iraqi civilians have died in the war
This may be as high as 200,000, but the Iraqi Government will not release the official numbers
1.2 Billion people live on .23 cents a day
1 billion people live on less than $2 dollars a day
The 3 wealthiest people alive today have more than all the worlds poorest countries combined
12% of the worlds population uses 85% of the worlds water
1 billion people in the world are without clean drinking water
Americans consume 26 billion liters of bottled water each year (bottled water)
Every 16 seconds someone dies of starvation.
2/3 of American are considered overweight
The U.S. is 4% of the worlds population
The U.S. G.D.P. is 21.4% of the worlds capital
Every year the U.S. spends more money on trash bags than half the world spends on combined goods.
80% of the world lives in what is called sub-standard conditions
2 billion people live without electricity
Last year 22 million people died of preventable diseases
10 million of those were children
Americans consume 20 million barrels of oil a day
the Next largest oil consumer is China...5.6 million barrels a day.
Currently the war in Iraq has cost U.S. taxpayers 349 billion dollars (you and I)
It has cost the Pentagon over 300 billion dollars
Government experts say that by the time the war ends it will have cost a total of 1 trillion dollars.......
JUST IN CASE YOU WERE WONDERING
It would cost 6 billion people to educate the whole planet(not trillion, billion)
9 billion to give basic water sanitation to the whole planet
12 billion for global reproductive health (go ahead and look at how many babies die or contract aids during birth in Africa alone.
13 billion for food and nutritional needs for all the world
.......Last year America spent 9 billion dollars for gifts on Black Friday (that day after Thanksgiving, where everybody rushes out to get the sales that start at 6 am)
What do you do with this?.......
I love the country I live in, I have not been opposed to the war, and I am not a Bush hater. I am not pro war or a Bush lover. Today, I am just another confused American trying to figure out what to do with all this. I am not trying to make you loathe our great country or the war, I guess this is just some stuff I can't get off my mind. Stuff we should all be thinking about. These are all accurate facts in Government reports. You can find them all in a Library or legitamate website.
God Bless America, and everyone else too.
Friday, December 15, 2006
A little Privilege
I don't have any children yet, and I wont any time soon, but when I do, you can bet it will be planned for. Not just physically, but financially, spiritually, socially and well, all the other things I have not thought about yet. This is because I believe we ought to bring life into this world only when we are capable to provide the best care we can.
I was listening to a radio show today when the host was reading an article about government funding for children. The writer was opposed because she believed if people cannot afford to have children than they shouldn't. And furthermore it is not our problem to pay for their kids. Now, I don't agree with what this women said. Unfortunately, people who are unfit to parent do bring kids into the world, rather by accident or by choice. It is not the childs fault they have unfit parents and clearly, helpless children should never be neglected.
I will say however, I strongly agree with the message this writer was trying to convey.
In our current societal structure children are seen as many things; a way to become a legal resident, a way to receive government funding. Currently in Hollywood they are seen as the perfect accessory (chihauhaus are so last year). Sadly, it is not as often as it should be that children are seen for what they really are, a privilege and a gift. When you are responsible for the life of an individual creation, you have a duty that goes far beyond changing diapers.
I wish we could implement a system that made people go through screening before they could have a child. I mean, not just anyone gets to adopt a child, it's a long difficult process, so why does just anyone get to bare one? Many say that it's our God given right to have children, some even say it's their job (go therefourth and multiply). But with the least disrespect I can say this with, some people simply are not cut out to be parents. Sadley, it is too easy to get pregnant or get someone pregnant and our world is filled with too many irresponsible people, and as a product of this, more children will be born to unfit parents. I wish there was someway we could prevent certain people from parenting, or at least make sure only people who could provide adequate care get to be parents. But that will probably never happen, so thank God for families who help the unfit, because no one likes to see a child un-loved.
I was listening to a radio show today when the host was reading an article about government funding for children. The writer was opposed because she believed if people cannot afford to have children than they shouldn't. And furthermore it is not our problem to pay for their kids. Now, I don't agree with what this women said. Unfortunately, people who are unfit to parent do bring kids into the world, rather by accident or by choice. It is not the childs fault they have unfit parents and clearly, helpless children should never be neglected.
I will say however, I strongly agree with the message this writer was trying to convey.
In our current societal structure children are seen as many things; a way to become a legal resident, a way to receive government funding. Currently in Hollywood they are seen as the perfect accessory (chihauhaus are so last year). Sadly, it is not as often as it should be that children are seen for what they really are, a privilege and a gift. When you are responsible for the life of an individual creation, you have a duty that goes far beyond changing diapers.
I wish we could implement a system that made people go through screening before they could have a child. I mean, not just anyone gets to adopt a child, it's a long difficult process, so why does just anyone get to bare one? Many say that it's our God given right to have children, some even say it's their job (go therefourth and multiply). But with the least disrespect I can say this with, some people simply are not cut out to be parents. Sadley, it is too easy to get pregnant or get someone pregnant and our world is filled with too many irresponsible people, and as a product of this, more children will be born to unfit parents. I wish there was someway we could prevent certain people from parenting, or at least make sure only people who could provide adequate care get to be parents. But that will probably never happen, so thank God for families who help the unfit, because no one likes to see a child un-loved.
Friday, November 03, 2006
Picks For 06'
Well my fellow Californians, it has come to my attention recently that most people, even the educated ones are unaware of everthing that is on the ballot ths year. Don't feel bad if you are completely clueless to what we are voting for next week. You are voting aren't you? Most of us don't have the time to read the original bills and make decisions on the 13 pieces of legislature. Most of us. Lucky for you, my lack of social life has allowed me to do the research for you. Now, these are my picks, you don't have to agree with me, I'm no professional politician. However, if you are interested, here are the students picks for 06'
Proposition 1A : NO- Why do we need our gas tax to only go to road improvements? We need something to regulate where our gas tax goes, but only having tax go to road projects is not that helpful. It just simply does not seem that productive. It also does not provide flexibility for local government in case funds need go elsewhere.
Proposition 1B: YES- Opponents think this is not a wise way to spend money we don't have, but better security at our shipping ports is necessary, public transit would be beneficial, and CA-epecially So. Cal, needs some help with the pollution. There is strict regulations, and it will not raise taxes.
Proposiion1C: YES- Overall, this may not be the best way to go about creating better low income housing, and larger families may take the bulk of the responsibiblity. But for the most part we would just be barrowing money we can't afford to pay back. There are a few subtleties that are questionable, but we must do something for our seniors and orphans, and abused women need a place to go and feel safe.
Proposition 1D: NO- I don't want to neglect our schools and I have seen a fair amount of schools that need the help. However, 10 billion dollars in debt and no garuntee on where the money will go makes me weary. There are many schools who are not promised anything and there is no regulation on what the money will go to. This prop is just too shady, and seemingly not supported by the Ca. Teachers Association.
Proposition 1E: No- This is basically a 4 billion dollar patch job. We cannot aford higher taxes to "kind of" fix our levee system and not provide and drinking water in the process. Rebuilding CA. is a good thing but this is not the best solution, let's get back to the drawing board.
Proposition 83: NO- Nobody despises child predators more than me, but this prop. is shabby and we need to take a stand a demand something better. 500 million to track misdameanor and non-violent offenders? (WHAT?) We need a serious solution to our predator problem, and this does not make punishment more severe. This same system has failed at other state levels and we need to take a stand. Maybe by rejecting inadequate state attempts we can force congress to do something at a national level. That is what we really need, a major national regulation of sex offenders, Not house arrest for streakers.
Proposition 84: NO- 5.4 billion for clean drinking water? What are we Mexico? Come on, this prop. has no written plan on where the money will go
Proposition 85: Yes- I don't think I have to explain. If you think it's a bad idea that minors should be required to get parental consent to get an abortion, you probably should not vote anyway. This measure does not criminalize abortion, neither am I, it is just logical that Doctors should be allowed to contact minors seeking abortions. Do you want your 14 year old getting an abortion without telling you? I didn't think so.
Proposition 86: NO: This Prop says it will save 700, 000 kids from becomming adult smokers and prevent 300, 000 smoking related deaths. However, it's very loose explanation and shady plans make it look like a $2.60 tax on cigarettes will just cushion the pockets of medical buracracies. I don't know, it looks shady, and I'm not buying it.
Proposition 87: NO- Prop 87 Taxes oil production to create money for alternative energy research. Alternative energy is good, we need it, but everytime oil companies get taxed more they raise gas prices to compensate. The prop. says that it gives gas companies incentives to persue alternative energy. However, I think it just gives them reason to hike gas prices. This requires no results from oil companies and seems to be an energy burearcracy'a dream come true.
Proposition 88: NO- California has enough property taxes already! If they want to give more to schools, than rebudget, but Californians already pay enough property taxes. If you want details, email me and I'll give them to you. But the truth is this money will be regulated by the wrong people and while most schools won't get any money, others will continue to be forced to move out of California because they can't afford the soaring taxes. How many states have higher property taxes than mortgage rates?
Proposition 89: NO!- This proposition taxes financial instituions and corporations totalling about 200 million annualy to fund political campaigns.- While this may help everyday American run in elections, it may also just give politicians more money for their negative campaigns. It would be nice for the teachers and and nurses to run for public office but there is no promise that greedy politicians won't see any of the money, and that is likely to happen-Politicians getting more of OUR money to run their corrupt campaigns.
Proposition 90: ? This is a difficult and confusing prop. There are so many unkown variables and there is so much at stake. Many have said this prop, was written to not be understood by the general public. It is hard to understand because there are so many details they leave out. As of right now I am not voting on this Prop. However, if I change my mind I will let you know.
Proposition 1A : NO- Why do we need our gas tax to only go to road improvements? We need something to regulate where our gas tax goes, but only having tax go to road projects is not that helpful. It just simply does not seem that productive. It also does not provide flexibility for local government in case funds need go elsewhere.
Proposition 1B: YES- Opponents think this is not a wise way to spend money we don't have, but better security at our shipping ports is necessary, public transit would be beneficial, and CA-epecially So. Cal, needs some help with the pollution. There is strict regulations, and it will not raise taxes.
Proposiion1C: YES- Overall, this may not be the best way to go about creating better low income housing, and larger families may take the bulk of the responsibiblity. But for the most part we would just be barrowing money we can't afford to pay back. There are a few subtleties that are questionable, but we must do something for our seniors and orphans, and abused women need a place to go and feel safe.
Proposition 1D: NO- I don't want to neglect our schools and I have seen a fair amount of schools that need the help. However, 10 billion dollars in debt and no garuntee on where the money will go makes me weary. There are many schools who are not promised anything and there is no regulation on what the money will go to. This prop is just too shady, and seemingly not supported by the Ca. Teachers Association.
Proposition 1E: No- This is basically a 4 billion dollar patch job. We cannot aford higher taxes to "kind of" fix our levee system and not provide and drinking water in the process. Rebuilding CA. is a good thing but this is not the best solution, let's get back to the drawing board.
Proposition 83: NO- Nobody despises child predators more than me, but this prop. is shabby and we need to take a stand a demand something better. 500 million to track misdameanor and non-violent offenders? (WHAT?) We need a serious solution to our predator problem, and this does not make punishment more severe. This same system has failed at other state levels and we need to take a stand. Maybe by rejecting inadequate state attempts we can force congress to do something at a national level. That is what we really need, a major national regulation of sex offenders, Not house arrest for streakers.
Proposition 84: NO- 5.4 billion for clean drinking water? What are we Mexico? Come on, this prop. has no written plan on where the money will go
Proposition 85: Yes- I don't think I have to explain. If you think it's a bad idea that minors should be required to get parental consent to get an abortion, you probably should not vote anyway. This measure does not criminalize abortion, neither am I, it is just logical that Doctors should be allowed to contact minors seeking abortions. Do you want your 14 year old getting an abortion without telling you? I didn't think so.
Proposition 86: NO: This Prop says it will save 700, 000 kids from becomming adult smokers and prevent 300, 000 smoking related deaths. However, it's very loose explanation and shady plans make it look like a $2.60 tax on cigarettes will just cushion the pockets of medical buracracies. I don't know, it looks shady, and I'm not buying it.
Proposition 87: NO- Prop 87 Taxes oil production to create money for alternative energy research. Alternative energy is good, we need it, but everytime oil companies get taxed more they raise gas prices to compensate. The prop. says that it gives gas companies incentives to persue alternative energy. However, I think it just gives them reason to hike gas prices. This requires no results from oil companies and seems to be an energy burearcracy'a dream come true.
Proposition 88: NO- California has enough property taxes already! If they want to give more to schools, than rebudget, but Californians already pay enough property taxes. If you want details, email me and I'll give them to you. But the truth is this money will be regulated by the wrong people and while most schools won't get any money, others will continue to be forced to move out of California because they can't afford the soaring taxes. How many states have higher property taxes than mortgage rates?
Proposition 89: NO!- This proposition taxes financial instituions and corporations totalling about 200 million annualy to fund political campaigns.- While this may help everyday American run in elections, it may also just give politicians more money for their negative campaigns. It would be nice for the teachers and and nurses to run for public office but there is no promise that greedy politicians won't see any of the money, and that is likely to happen-Politicians getting more of OUR money to run their corrupt campaigns.
Proposition 90: ? This is a difficult and confusing prop. There are so many unkown variables and there is so much at stake. Many have said this prop, was written to not be understood by the general public. It is hard to understand because there are so many details they leave out. As of right now I am not voting on this Prop. However, if I change my mind I will let you know.
Monday, October 16, 2006
Ha Ha Ha
Well it looks as if Hugo Chavez has been denied a position on the UN Security council. Honestly, it's kinda funny that Chavez thought his recent antics would in any way merrit him enough respect to get a spot on the council. However, it turns out we all still think he is just a crazy jack ass with lots of oil. I still believe that he should never be allowed in our country again, and please, please, never by Citgo gas again, it is your civic duty. Seriously though, the way global politics have been going lately I would not have been suprised if Chavez had gotten his wish. Not to mention the UN have not been making te greatest decisions in the past few years, however, they have seemingly redeemed themselves in a one week time period. First, they approve sanctions on North Korea and then they say no go to Hugo.
Speaking of North Korea, it was confirmed this week that their test bomb was nuclear. We can only pray that this information will lead to tougher sanctions and eventual diplomacy. However, for now we can just laugh at Kim Jong Ill and Hugo Chavez and rub in the fact that their silly antics only got them in trouble. Let's hope they learned their lesson.
Speaking of North Korea, it was confirmed this week that their test bomb was nuclear. We can only pray that this information will lead to tougher sanctions and eventual diplomacy. However, for now we can just laugh at Kim Jong Ill and Hugo Chavez and rub in the fact that their silly antics only got them in trouble. Let's hope they learned their lesson.
Saturday, October 14, 2006
Pent Up
Well, I am sorry I have been absent for a while. Every now and then, the news gets to the point where it upsets me and I have to take a break from the world so I don't go crazy. However, about a week is all I can stand, then being disconnected makes me go crazy...I know I have some issues I need to work out. Keeping on the subject of my issues, I have a few things I have read about lately that I need to get off my chest, non of them are positive or nice. I am sorry, it's purely coincedence.
Anyways, first I must retract a previous post of mine about Mel Gibson. In a article called "Poor old Mel", I said I believed he was recieving harsh treatment by the media and that everyone should let his drunken rants go and move on. However, as the last few months have unfolded I have recieved some new revelations. In all the interviews I have seen Gibson in and all the occasions in which he has publically spoke, he has done nothing but support the accusations made by his critics. Now, I am not saying that I now beleive him to be a Jewish hating Nazi with plans for world domination. However, I do feel like his explanations of what happened in Malibu and his defense of his fathers anti-Jewish past have been anything but sincere or honest. I could be wrong but as of late he really does not appear to be that regretful of what he said and he always avoids his fathers similar lifestyle of anti-Jewish connections.
Is his almost sorrowful attitude just a front to get people to forgive him enough to go see Apacalypto?
Also, what ever happened to that crazy psyco women that pushed her husband off a Princess cruise ship. I feel stupid for not remembering her name but, whatever, it's been a while. It just popped in my head today. Remember when it was all over the news, all the evidence was against her and she was playing victim. She said the cruise line treated her like an animal and left her in some foreign land. Well, guess what psyco, that what happens to crazy chicks that murder their husbands, stop trying to excuse your murderous tendencies. Ok, sorry, I don't know where that came from. My point is, last I heard they were investigating, she said she didn't do it, but the physical evidence said she was OJ. So, I want to know, what happened?
Ok, I was also going to say some things about John Mayer and Kirk Mayfield, but I am too bothered right now, so I will cool down and write it later so nobody gets their feelings hurt.
Anyways, first I must retract a previous post of mine about Mel Gibson. In a article called "Poor old Mel", I said I believed he was recieving harsh treatment by the media and that everyone should let his drunken rants go and move on. However, as the last few months have unfolded I have recieved some new revelations. In all the interviews I have seen Gibson in and all the occasions in which he has publically spoke, he has done nothing but support the accusations made by his critics. Now, I am not saying that I now beleive him to be a Jewish hating Nazi with plans for world domination. However, I do feel like his explanations of what happened in Malibu and his defense of his fathers anti-Jewish past have been anything but sincere or honest. I could be wrong but as of late he really does not appear to be that regretful of what he said and he always avoids his fathers similar lifestyle of anti-Jewish connections.
Is his almost sorrowful attitude just a front to get people to forgive him enough to go see Apacalypto?
Also, what ever happened to that crazy psyco women that pushed her husband off a Princess cruise ship. I feel stupid for not remembering her name but, whatever, it's been a while. It just popped in my head today. Remember when it was all over the news, all the evidence was against her and she was playing victim. She said the cruise line treated her like an animal and left her in some foreign land. Well, guess what psyco, that what happens to crazy chicks that murder their husbands, stop trying to excuse your murderous tendencies. Ok, sorry, I don't know where that came from. My point is, last I heard they were investigating, she said she didn't do it, but the physical evidence said she was OJ. So, I want to know, what happened?
Ok, I was also going to say some things about John Mayer and Kirk Mayfield, but I am too bothered right now, so I will cool down and write it later so nobody gets their feelings hurt.
Sunday, October 08, 2006
Inadequate
For all of my California friends I must warn you that we have a major problem on our hands. This problem is the possibility of Phil Angelides being our next govorner. I honestly don't think he has a chance to win (especially after how fooolish he made himself sound in the debates this last week) but the fact there as any likelyhood frightens me. Just for the record, I am not a huge Arnold fan but I have no doubts he is a safer choice for California. If you watched the debates last week you would have heard Angelides creepily avoid ever explaining how he would make California better if elected and you would never have heard him speak intelligently about any political issues surrounding our state right now. All Angelides did the entire debate was try to make Arnold look bad by attacking his character and abilities. Where I come from we call this insecurity. This is when a person has no qualities of there own to boast of so they attack other people in hopes that they will look better. To be honest, I don't know if Phil Angelides has any idea what he will do if elected, I don't even know if he is aware of the real issues that need to be adressed. I do think he hoped to make Arnold look so bad that he might fool people into thinking he is a qualified gubernatorial candidate. However, his tactics failed and he fooled nobody (I wonder if he is related to John Kerry).
Suprisingly, Arnold remained calm and polite the entire debate. Despite the attacks by his opponent, Arnold responded to Angelides maturely and then proceded to talk about the real issues. He may be a bad actor, but he is not a bad public official, and I get the feeling Arnold really cares about California.
I don't know, If you don't like Arnold than fine, don't vote for him, but I hope you realize that everybody else running is....inadequate.
Suprisingly, Arnold remained calm and polite the entire debate. Despite the attacks by his opponent, Arnold responded to Angelides maturely and then proceded to talk about the real issues. He may be a bad actor, but he is not a bad public official, and I get the feeling Arnold really cares about California.
I don't know, If you don't like Arnold than fine, don't vote for him, but I hope you realize that everybody else running is....inadequate.
